Today’s writer topic comes from QSFer Denise Dechene:
Why is it in most books the smaller male is always the bottom or almost always the bottom? I’m not talking about someone who is versatile. In most books the smaller male is usually the bottom or is versatile. In comparison the larger male is usually the top or versatile.
Why don’t we see more larger muscular guys being exclusively a bottom and vice versa?
Writers: This is a reader chat – you are welcome to join it, but please do not reference your own works directly. Thanks!